Diversification or Divestment – Opposite ends of the same Strategy

When an entrepreneur starts a business, there is usually one product/service in mind.  They are focused on marketing and distribution.  As they grow, they begin to think about diversifying the business mix.  But whether your business sells Real Estate, Insurance or widgets, the primary reasons for diversification are to reduce risk, stabilize cash flow, and preserve a competitive advantage.  Through diversification, you can

-Ensure sales during seasons when the demand for your primary product is low.  In this situation, a firm should sell a related product that is active during business lulls, i.e. firm sells heating systems, as well as air cooling systems;

-Satisfy customer demands for related products.  One mistake in business is to refer your client to a competitor, to satisfy a need which you cannot fill.  More than likely, once they go, they will never come back.  One stop shopping for customers is always preferable over visiting multiple vendors;

-Assume control of a supply or distribution chain, i.e. Amazon begins Sunday deliveries, to increase customer satisfaction;

-Stay competitive by exploring growth opportunities, i.e. develop new markets and/or attract new customers; and,

-Balance a business which has long periods between sales with a quick sales cycle, i.e. automotive sales which may occur every five years, offering auto service which occurs every six months.

From a purely finance perspective, when investing capital to achieve growth, only commit capital to those projects that meet your profit expectations, return on investment requirements and results in a positive free cash flow position.

Profit – Funds available after total expenses are deducted from total revenues.  The basis from which taxes are calculated.  Pre-tax profits can be calculated monthly, quarterly, annually.  This value is ideal to plan annually.

-Return on Investments (ROI) – Ratio of Income generated over dollars invested in a process or product financed, to stimulate the growth of the company.  ROI is usually tracked for three to five years.  This statistic should be used to ensure that financial resources are being allocated to growth opportunities with the highest returns.

-Free Cash Flow (FCF) – Funds available after paying expenses, adjusted for non-cash items, minus capital expenditures to maintain the firm’s current productive capacity, i.e. the amount available for distributions or future growth prospects. FCF is an annual measure.

A company that incorporates a diversification strategy should be prepared to also at times consider a divestment approach.  Periodically every business should review its product lines and services, to understand the profitability generated.  The natural result will be an emphasis on the most profitable activities; while de-emphasizing the less profitable or money loosing activities.  Through this exercise, you will quickly identify problems in products and service fulfillment.

When you discover a line or business that is not performing as planned, there will be three questions that need to be asked – Is the business inefficient, but can be optimized?  Is the business being managed by the correct person?  Is the activity important to the overall strategy of your business?

If this line or business is not critical to your strategy, it may be time to divest.

It is not uncommon to read the press and see an article about a company divesting of a subsidiary.  The next day, there is another press article that the same company is acquiring an entity.  There are multiple reasons why a business may divest itself of a product line or subsidiary – the business does not meet expectations of profits, return on investment, or free cash flow targets.  These success targets may have been missed due to faulty production assumptions in the planning of the new line or subsidiary; or external factors may make the business no longer profitable.  Common external factors include unexpected regulation or taxes that make the business more expensive than previously planned; or a new competitor enters the market with a lower cost of doing business.

But the greatest reason for divesting an unsuccessful line or business is to free capital, so it may be allocated to more profitable activities.

When was the last time your business mix was reviewed?

Author: Regis Quirin
Visit Regis's Website - Email Regis
Regis Quirin is a financial executive with 23 years of corporate experience, i.e. New York Stock Exchange, JP Morgan Chase, and GMAC ResCap; and 15 years working with small and medium-sized entities, i.e. joint ventures, start-up entities, established businesses. In 2014, Regis published "Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses" available via Amazon.

Why are so many companies announcing a Turnaround?

So far in 2014, turnarounds have been discussed domestically at Radio Shack, Yahoo, Best Buy, Lowe’s and JCPenney, to name a few.  Internationally, word of turnarounds have been reported at Sony, HTC, Carrefour…   So what has caused this trend?

Simply stated, when business is good, it is very easy to overlook inefficiency and waste.  But the macroeconomic weakness that is affecting the US is resulting in sales declines; while at the same time costs continue to rise. As a result, profits decline.  A business may find itself in need of turnaround assistance based on unforeseen external factors, i.e. a natural disaster, competition, new regulation, new taxation assessed federally or at the local level.  While internally, rapid unplanned growth can be very disruptive, if the focus turned away from profitability.  This growth may have been attributed to organic growth or a merger or acquisition.

The most detailed and transparent turnaround discussed is the turnaround at Hewlett Packard –

Meg Whitman joined HP as the President and Chief Executive Officer in September 2011.  After a year of assessing the HP situation, Ms. Whitman announced a Turnaround.  At a Security Analyst Meeting (10/03/2012), Ms. Whitman attributed the need for a turnaround to several factors, including a change in the IT industry; constant change in executive leadership of the company; decentralized marketing; integration of acquired companies; misalignment of compensation and accountability; lack of metrics and scorecards to manage the business; lack of a cost containment focus; product gaps; and ineffective sales management.  The turnaround which began in 2012 is expected to take hold by 2016.

The solution to counter this situation is a redesign, i.e. a focus on stream-lining processes and cost containment.  Interestingly, the method to redesign a business is the implementation of standard business management “best practices.”  But to fully implement a turnaround, innovation and growth will be required.  Customers’ needs must be placed at the center of your decision making and a focus on business development will be required.

Start by assessing and understanding the amount of change required and develop approaches that will minimize the potential for disruption.

Superior management and flawless execution will be required.  Each member of the management team should understand their responsibility and be committed to work together as a team to redesign to turnaround the underperforming business.  A commitment to financial discipline and a returns based capital allocation strategy is required.

Going forward, managing the business should be accomplished from a data based perspective.  Any decision regarding the use of funds and or the changing of strategies needs to be quantified.  Opinions should be the basis for investigation, but data should be the reason for actions.  An executive needs to be able to read financial and production numbers; as well as understand the significance of combining the data sets to grow.  If you do not understand the drivers of revenues and expenses, or the significance of production data, any decision will be a best guess on how to proceed.

If you understand the current situation with respect to the market, competitors, customers and employees, you will be better able to develop detailed strategies that allow you to minimize weakness, maximize opportunities, and mitigate threats.

Managing cash flow is critical.  The optimal approach is to employ conservative and sound financial and accounting policies; maintain a strong working capital position; and implement accurate and responsible reporting that looks at variances to established plans.

In a turnaround situation, a “best practice” is to document and review policies and procedures; to stream-line and remove inefficiencies; discontinue manual tasks through automation; and, enhance security through segregation of duties.  The outcome will naturally be cost savings.  Circumventing established policies and procedures exposes the firm to errors, unnecessary risks and costs associated with wasted time.

If you are in a business turnaround situation, it is very easy to think the proper decision is to slash the marketing budget to cut expenses.  But, it is during these tough times that marketing and sales are the most important.  As expenses keep increasing, revenues at the very least must keep pace, or profits suffer.  Annually, new customers must be sourced.

The role of your marketing department is to collaborate on strategic campaigns and point of sale initiatives; while fostering a consistent and standard sales approach across all corporate communications and marketing efforts.

The redesign steps are as follows –

  • Communicate the need to redesign to senior managers and the board of directors, to gain concurrence;
  • Select a respected executive with the authority to cross department lines to lead the project.  This individual will be the champion of the project and facilitate the integration of change;
  • Perform a key assessment of the organization to prioritize the trouble spots;
  • Set strategy and establish a cash flow plan for the next 12 months, based on the current situation;
  • Communicate the strategy companywide, as well as the intentions to redesign companywide processes, to gain employee understanding and involvement in the process;
  • Optimize support functions; and,
  • Emphasize business development to grow.

Communicate with the Board of Directors, throughout the process.

The speed at which the process can be completed will be based on the amount of redesign required and the commitment of your management and staff to make required changes.

 

In 2014, Regis published Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses.  To read chapter one of the manuscript, click Here.  Recommendations so far have been positive.  To order your copy, click

Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses

Author: Regis Quirin
Visit Regis's Website - Email Regis
Regis Quirin is a financial executive with 23 years of corporate experience, i.e. New York Stock Exchange, JP Morgan Chase, and GMAC ResCap; and 15 years working with small and medium-sized entities, i.e. joint ventures, start-up entities, established businesses. In 2014, Regis published "Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses" available via Amazon.

The Frequency of Best Practices with Small and Medium-Sized Businesses

Business failures are all too common.  You may be an excellent doctor, accountant, architect or engineer.  You may be a specialist in your field, but respectfully, it does not mean you know the nuances of running a successful business.  Sadly, mismanagement is one of the primary reasons for business failures.

“Best Practices” are techniques that businesses employ to control costs, stream-line processes and avoid disruptions.  Over the years I have worked for three very large companies; and worked with a great many small and medium sized businesses.  I have found that small and medium-sized businesses incorporate some Best Practices, but not consistently.  However each large Fortune 100 company I worked with incorporated best practices consistently.

On March 6, 2014, CFOTips published a quick 32 question survey to understand the existence of standard best practices in small and medium-sized businesses.  Questions were general, so the concepts would have applicability to all responders, regardless of the business model.  Select results were as follows –

  • To understand the success of your business, it is recommended that an annual business planning process be conducted.  But when asked, only 47% of responders had a long-term plan of where they expected to be in five years; while only 47% of responders had a documented, detailed business plan for the next 12 months.
  • A best practice for an entity is to annually set strategy for the coming year.  This activity requires external information to validate your approach and direction.  Interestingly, only 41% of responders conducted competitor surveys; while 59% conducted customer satisfaction surveys; and 41% conducted employee satisfaction surveys.  Only 59% of entities conducted an analysis of their place in the market, similar to a Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat (SWOT) analysis.
  • To ensure processes are efficient and reduce expenses, a best practice is to establish policies and procedures and document job descriptions.  Only 41% of responders have policies and procedures for most, if not all processes; and 59% of responders have job descriptions.
  • To ensure your cash flow is not disrupted, a best practice is to have a collections process and utilize it when required.  Based on our survey, only 65% of responders have an established collections process.
  • To reduce the risk, of fraud annually a segregation of duties analysis should be performed.  Yet only 47% of responders performed a segregation of duty analysis.  And to ensure an environment where all employees act on behalf of the company’s best interests, ethics policies should be established, with a system available by which employees can identify unethical behavior.  While 75% of responders have an ethics policy, only 35% of responders have a whistleblower program.
  • To control costs, periodically vendor agreements should be reviewed to understand what you are paying for and what you are receiving.  Yet, only 35% of responders review vendor agreements and company needs periodically.
  • But the most surprising results were related to the prevalence of a business continuity plan.  Only 29% of responders reported a documented business continuity plan for their business.

Note, as less than 100 responses were received, this information should be considered directional only.  How do you compare?

Author: Regis Quirin
Visit Regis's Website - Email Regis
Regis Quirin is a financial executive with 23 years of corporate experience, i.e. New York Stock Exchange, JP Morgan Chase, and GMAC ResCap; and 15 years working with small and medium-sized entities, i.e. joint ventures, start-up entities, established businesses. In 2014, Regis published "Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses" available via Amazon.