Big Data for Pricing Optimization

If you study Marketing, you learn that pricing is part of the “marketing mix.”  The firm combines price, product, place and promotion in the hope of finding the appropriate relationship to appeal to the target market.  The degree at which these variables are manipulated is based on available data, i.e. geographic assumptions and customer qualities within the geography.  If your product has features that are different from what is currently offered in the market, it may be possible to garner a higher price, if consumers can distinguish the feature differences.

But in situations where offerings are similar, differentiation must be established at the company level. Why would consumers buy from me vs. my competitors, if I offer similar products? In this situation the company must adjust the value it delivers to customers, i.e. its value proposition.  The answer to the question – you should buy from me because of my knowledge, experience and customer service expertise.  It may be possible to garner a higher price, if consumers can distinguish the value difference.

It only makes sense that if you improve the quality of the data used to make decisions regarding the marketing mix components and the value offered, the firm will benefit financially.  Through the use of large data sets that consider consumer preferences and actions “Big Data” analytics may help you achieve this goal.

As reported in Game changers: Five opportunities for US growth and renewal a McKinsey Global Institute study (July 2013), “Amazon has taken cross-selling to a new level with sophisticated predictive algorithms that prompt customers with recommendations for related products, services, bundled promotions, and even dynamic pricing; its recommendation engine reportedly drives 30 percent of sales.  But most retailers are still in the earliest stages of implementing these technologies and have achieved best-in-class performance only in narrow functions, such as merchandising or promotions.” (page 75)

Big Data analytics are typically used for the following –

-improve internal processes;

-improve products or services;

-develop new products or services; and,

-enhance targeted offerings.

Implementing a “Big Data” approach requires hardware, software and highly technical quantitative analysts that have the specific knowledge to glean results from large data sets.  If you were looking to investigate the potential benefits that you may receive from a Big Data analytics program, it would make sense to outsource a test.  If the test is successful and you believe that an internal resource should be developed, you will be in a better position to develop that function internally.

There are a few companies today that offer “Big Data” services – Accenture, Deloitte, Oracle, PROS Pricing, SAP, Vendavo, Vistaar, and Zillant.

Does your company use “Big Data?  How?

Author: Regis Quirin
Visit Regis's Website - Email Regis
Regis Quirin is a financial executive with 23 years of corporate experience, i.e. New York Stock Exchange, JP Morgan Chase, and GMAC ResCap; and 15 years working with small and medium-sized entities, i.e. joint ventures, start-up entities, established businesses. In 2014, Regis published "Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses" available via Amazon.

Is it time to Plan for Growth?

A sample of recent survey results published, showed that finance professionals will be looking in the near future, to stimulate company growth, after years of focusing on cost containment, reducing debt and risk management.

– “79 percent said they would, in part, reinvest in their businesses and/or fund acquisitions using their cash holdings.”  (Accenture 2013 CFO Survey)

– “80 percent of CFOs plan to spend liquid cash on hand on investment in operations and growth initiatives, further emphasizing the importance of operations to many companies’ overall business strategies, as well as the CFO’s involvement in the execution of those plans.”  (Korn/Ferry 2013 CFO Pulse Survey)

-“ CFOs say their top uses of cash will be investments in organic and inorganic growth – well ahead of alternatives like funding operational improvement efforts and holding cash as a risk hedge.”  (Deloitte 2Q13 CFO Signals ™ What North America’s top finance executives are thinking – and doing)

Statistics support the notion that since the “Great Recession,” capital expenditures have not yet recovered.  According to the US Census Bureau’s Annual Capital Expenditures Survey, from 2008 to 2009, capital expenditures declined 20.63%.  For the following two years, increases have been minimal, 1.38% from 2009 to 2010 and 10.84% from 2010 to 2011.  While this survey is not all inclusive, it serves as a good proxy of activity for all companies and may point to pent up demand by businesses to invest in profit generation activities.

From a purely finance perspective, when investing capital to achieve growth, only commit capital to those projects that exceed the firm’s cost of capital.  But the piece that is very difficult to quantify is related to the disruption generated that accompanies a change to the organization.

Broadly, growth comes from increasing the current products and services offered.  The difference comes in to play in how that goal is achieved and executed –

-Expansion of current capacity (least disruptive), to drive down the cost of production and increase sales capacity.  In this situation, current policies and procedures and risk mitigation measures, need not change.  Profit growth is essentially related to driving down expenses through productivity increases.  The effects of changes in this area may be realized within twelve months.

-Expansion of a related product or service (minimally disruptive), that compliments your current offering.  This approach may require the addition of headcount that are experts in the new product or service.  Current policies and procedures and risk mitigation measures, may need to be enhanced.  This approach may lead to incremental profitability increases.  The effects of changes in this area may be realized within twenty-four to thirty-six months.

-Merger/Acquisition (most disruptive) associated with the integration of the current organization with the acquired organization.  This approach may lead to a sharp increase in profits, if done correctly.  In addition to increasing capacity, this approach will serve to remove/eliminate a competitor.  The effects of changes in this area may be realized within sixty months.

Prior to the implementation, perform a rigorous review and analysis – set a plan, manage the investment approach, validate assumptions, and modify if necessary.  Timing required and profitability gained will be directly related to the ability to Execute on the established plan to achieve the projected financial results.

Every business should constantly consider options to grow or risk losing market share to a competitor that has invested in growth.

How will your organization grow in the next 24 months?

Author: Regis Quirin
Visit Regis's Website - Email Regis
Regis Quirin is a financial executive with 23 years of corporate experience, i.e. New York Stock Exchange, JP Morgan Chase, and GMAC ResCap; and 15 years working with small and medium-sized entities, i.e. joint ventures, start-up entities, established businesses. In 2014, Regis published "Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses" available via Amazon.