The Three Financial Metrics Every Business Should Track

There are 100’s of ratios used to analyze financial statements if you are an investor.  Some of these ratios are specific to industries and business models, i.e. manufacturing vs. service.  Regardless, if you are the owner or a partner in an entity, there are three primary metrics that measure the financial health of your company, that should be reviewed periodically –

Profit – Funds available after total expenses are deducted from total revenues.  The basis from which taxes are calculated.  Pre-tax profits can be calculated monthly, quarterly, annually.  This value is ideal to plan annually.

Return on Investments (ROI) –  Ratio of Income generated over dollars invested in a process or product financed, to stimulate the growth of the company.  ROI is usually tracked for three to five years.  This statistic should be used to ensure that financial resources are being allocated to growth opportunities with the highest returns.

Free Cash Flow (FCF) – Funds available after paying expenses, adjusted for non-cash items, minus capital expenditures to maintain the firm’s current productive capacity, i.e. the amount available for distributions or future growth prospects. FCF is an annual measure.

A company should only allocate cash to the most profitable uses, with the highest return on investment, which will provide potential distributable benefits to its investors, within the shortest amount of time.

The preferable way to present this data is via a Scorecard that highlights Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) that the company deems appropriate to gauge success at achieving strategic goals.  These reports are metric centric and show results over time.   As a general rule, KPI’s provide information which gives the reader a quick glance of success from a financial, operational, and risk perspective.  A successful scorecard will assist the company drive profitability, reduce costs and provide insight into risk.

What ratio do you use to track your success?

Author: Regis Quirin
Visit Regis's Website - Email Regis
Regis Quirin is a financial executive with 23 years of corporate experience, i.e. New York Stock Exchange, JP Morgan Chase, and GMAC ResCap; and 15 years working with small and medium-sized entities, i.e. joint ventures, start-up entities, established businesses. In 2014, Regis published "Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses" available via Amazon.

Are Defined Benefit Pension Plans becoming too much of a cash drain?

It is not uncommon to read about very large companies taking non-cash charges associated with their defined benefit plans – UPS $3 billion, Boeing $3.1 billion, Ford $5 billion…

A defined benefit pension program is a retirement plan funded by the employer, which promises a monthly benefit to the employee upon retirement. Contribution amounts are based on a benefit formula which takes into account employee income, age and years of service.   Simply stated, employers set aside an amount today that is expected to grow over years, to be able to satisfy a future commitment.  If you have ever discounted cash flows, you know that low interest rates will slow the projected  growth of the dollars set aside.

It is these low rates that are a primary cause of a trend in under-funded pension liabilities.   “Defined benefit pension assets for S&P 500 Index companies increased by $113 billion, from $1.11 trillion to $1.22 trillion, while liabilities increased $174 billion, from $1.39 trillion to $1.56 trillion. The median corporate funded ratio is 76.9%, which represents a modest decline from 77.7% last year.” (94% of Pension Plans Underfunded: Wilshire, by John Sullivan, AdvisorOne 04.11.2013)

While the goal should be to have a funded ratio of 100%, rating agencies use this statistic as a factor in judging the soundness of programs. The scale is as follows – Strong Funded Ratio >= 90%; Above Average > 80% but < 90%; Below Average > 60% but < 80%; and Weak <= 60%.

Based on this rating scale, on average, defined benefit pension assets for S&P 500 Index companies are below average.

In response, companies are setting aside large sums of money to fund programs, rather than invest or issue dividends to shareholders. “Between 2009 and 2012, companies in the Russell 3000-stock index have added $1 trillion in assets to their pension plans through investment returns and contributions, but their overall deficit still increased to an estimated $441 billion from $392 billion over that period, according to data from J.P. Morgan Asset Management.” (WSJ, Why the Corporate Pension Gap Is Soaring, 02.26.2013)

However, “Pension sponsors can’t sustain having to make large contributions year after year to finance their pension plans; they have to depend also on favorable investment markets and reasonable interest rates to contribute toward funding.” (Pension & Investments, The cost of low rates, 02.20.2012)

A protracted low rate environment will continue to make this pension plan structure a drag on corporate balance sheets for some time.  The likely impact will be a further decline in the usage of this pension plan structure.  According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the number of defined benefit plans fell 55% from 103,346 plans in 1975  to 46,543 plans in 2010.

Results are similar within the public sector –

According to Morningstar (The State of State Pension Plans A Deep Dive Into Shortfalls and Surpluses) using the rating scale revealed that in 2011,  70% of state pension funds were below average or weak: 7 programs were  strong with Wisconsin the strongest. 8 programs above average, 23 programs below average; and 12 programs weak with Illinois the weakest.

The only way to counteract this trend is to enter an environment with sustained, higher rates.

What are your thoughts?

Author: Regis Quirin
Visit Regis's Website - Email Regis
Regis Quirin is a financial executive with 23 years of corporate experience, i.e. New York Stock Exchange, JP Morgan Chase, and GMAC ResCap; and 15 years working with small and medium-sized entities, i.e. joint ventures, start-up entities, established businesses. In 2014, Regis published "Redesign to Turnaround Underperforming Small and Medium-Sized Businesses" available via Amazon.